Can McLaren Continue Playing Fair and Stop Max Verstappen? - Formula 1 Q&A
Red Bull's driver Max Verstappen closed the difference in the championship standings by securing victory in both the sprint race and main races at the Austin Grand Prix.
McLaren's Lando Norris finished second on Sunday to cut Oscar Piastri's championship lead to 14 points with five races left to go.
Four-times championship winner Verstappen is now just 40 points behind Piastri heading into this weekend's Mexico City Grand Prix.
Must McLaren Face the Truth of F1 - That if You Want Win, It's Not Always Possible to Play Fair?
The McLaren team are well aware of the obstacle they face with Verstappen and the Red Bull team in the drivers' championship this season, but they don't believe to change their method to managing the team.
They will continue to give their two drivers the optimal opportunity they can and operate the team on a basis of fairness and equanimity.
"This is the approach we intend racing. This remains the philosophy in which we tackle competition, and we aim to stay fair, and we intend to apply equality to both drivers."
Team principal Stella is a seasoned expert of numerous title battles. He claimed the title as race engineer to Raikkonen in the 2007 season when the Ferrari racer recovered 17 points under the previous points system in two Grands Prix to secure the title, while McLaren imploded.
And he lost the championship as engineer to Fernando Alonso in 2010, when Ferrari messed up their strategy at the final race of the season and enabled Vettel and the Red Bull team to sneak the title from under their noses.
Stella commented after the Grand Prix in Texas: "We look at the remaining five Grands Prix as chances to extend the gap on Verstappen. And when it involves having to make a decision as to a driver, this will only be determined by mathematics."
"We rely on the experience. I can remember at least 2007, 2010, in which you go to the final Grand Prix and it's in fact the [driver in] third [place] that claims the championship. So we're not going to close the door unless this is closed by the calculations."
Why Did McLaren Cease Upgrades on This Year's Car?
All teams this year have had to face the dilemma of how long to focus on their 2025 car while also making sure they are as ready as they can be for the major regulation change coming for the 2026 season.
In Formula 1, it's typically the case that if a team makes mistakes at the beginning of a new regulation period, it can take a long time to recover. And if they succeed, that benefit can last for a while - look at the Red Bull team in 2022 and 2023, the last time the rules were modified.
McLaren began this year with the best car, after putting a lot of technical development into their 2025 season design.
They continued to improve it for a period, but were finding reduced benefits. So when looking at the value for money they were getting on their 2025 car versus 2026, it became an easy choice to redirect attention to the following season.
The Red Bull team have closed the gap since introducing their new floor and front wing at the Italian Grand Prix, but the McLaren remains competitive - team principal Stella said he believed Lando Norris had the pace to compete for the victory in Austin had he not finished following Charles Leclerc.
"We just have to keep optimising the performance and continue delivering strong weekends. And from this perspective, if you think of a Grand Prix like Baku, we failed to optimize the car's potential and we didn't execute a perfect race."
"Therefore we have a significant chance, and the outcome of this championship and the driver's title is in our control. It's not placed in another team's control."
Driver Transfers: How Difficult Is It to Change Constructors?
First of all, it's uncertain the question has an entirely correct basis. It's correct that each of Lewis Hamilton and Carlos Sainz had somewhat difficult opening phases of the season, in different ways, and that they are now faring much better.
Carlos Sainz and Alex Albon currently look quite balanced. However, it's not so clear that, in Hamilton's case, he is currently the "match" of Leclerc - or not consistently, anyway.
Lewis Hamilton has failed to outperform Charles Leclerc very often at all this season, either in qualifying sessions or race.
He is currently much closer than he was. He is consistently qualifying within a small fraction of a second of his teammate, but in qualifying it's four-two to Charles Leclerc since the mid-season break.
This previous weekend in Texas, on one of Hamilton's preferred tracks, he was a full second behind his teammate when the Monaco driver made his pit stop, and dropped 13 seconds over the remaining portion of the race.
Looking back, Leclerc was on the best race strategy. Regardless, over the championship, and even currently, it's hard to claim that on balance Leclerc has hasn't been the better Ferrari driver this season.
Both Hamilton and Carlos Sainz have discussed how difficult it is to switch teams, and we have to take them at their word.
Hamilton would not claim even currently that he was completely adjusted to Ferrari - and he is hoping the new rules next year will benefit his driving style; he has never particularly liked these venturi cars.
There is a lot for a racing driver to understand and adapt to when they switch teams, as Hamilton has explained many times this season. But not all faces difficulties in this way.
Alonso, for example, was on it from the start of the 2023 season when he moved to the Aston Martin team. And would Verstappen struggle if he changed constructors? I believe the majority in F1 would expect not.
When Will We Know The Coming Season's Competitive Order?
Before the cars run for the first time in winter testing next season, nobody will know how the teams are looking next year.
The first test, in Barcelona on January 26-30, is private because the constructors preferred to understand their first running of the new engines without the scrutiny of the press.
So the two tests in Bahrain on 11-13 and February 18-20 will be the first time a certain indication of comparative speed becomes apparent.
But, as always, it's not until the first race that the complete and precise situation will emerge.