🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to employ a newly configured congressional district plan that could add several five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to lift a lower court's injunction that had rejected the new map in November.

Justices' Explanation

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disturbing the delicate balance of power in elections, the order stated in justifying its ruling.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably sorted voters based on their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the new maps. It had instructed the state to revert to the districts established after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Dissent

In a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She contended that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its opinion was crafted by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Struggle

This decision comes amid a countrywide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican majority. Usually, boundary revision occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that could add several additional conservative seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have responded with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures representation supportive of the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

In contrast, opposition party officials criticized the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another senior House figure said the court had another time eroded its credibility by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.