🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of votes added later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which election day went kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously went for the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does because then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many Republicans on the island with a high participation. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there was some opposition. But overall, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.